From e210025037fbd00c81e8faa0a5339dccdc0c75a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wangmeiyang <wangmeiyang_yewu@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:10:25 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 12/23] vshtabletest: Fix potential memleak
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

In testVshTableNew() we test whether vshTableNew(NULL) allocates
a table. This is expected to fail (and return NULL), because
passing nothing but NULL to vshTableNew() is viewed as error.
Nevertheless, if vshTableNew() did not fail and returned an
allocated table it would be leaked.

cherry-pick from eb9bbde7721af765d88086dc3055cff092436c58

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Meiyang Wang <wangmeiyang_yewu@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
---
 tests/vshtabletest.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/vshtabletest.c b/tests/vshtabletest.c
index 15369d8eb2..348f525234 100644
--- a/tests/vshtabletest.c
+++ b/tests/vshtabletest.c
@@ -33,11 +33,12 @@
 static int
 testVshTableNew(const void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
 {
-    if (vshTableNew(NULL)) {
+    vshTablePtr table = vshTableNew(NULL);
+    if (table) {
         fprintf(stderr, "expected failure when passing null to vshTableNew\n");
         return -1;
     }
-
+    vshTableFree(table);
     return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.27.0