代码拉取完成,页面将自动刷新
From 2cf0c28b12ab04f5a198f1638c7e2cf8ca7d725b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:56:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] iscsid/iscsiuio: fix OOM adjustment (#377)
* iscsid/iscsiuio: fix OOM adjustment
For both the iscsid and iscsiuio daemons, they try to modify
nice value and OOM adjustment value, so they have priority
and will not be killed by the OOM-killer.
But the code incorrectly set the value to "-17" for modern
linux systems, when the maximum is actually "-1000". While
making the changes, use "/proc/self/..." instead of
"/proc/<PID>/...", so we don't have to use getpid() nor
print out the pathname. Now we either write "-16" to
the old interface, "-1000" to the new interface, or we
print a warning.
Several "log_debug()" calls that should have been warnings
are changed to "log_warning()" calls in iscsid.
* iscsid/iscsiuio: fix OOM adjustment value for older systems
On older linux system, "-17" is the maximum, not "-16".
---
usr/iscsi_util.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
usr/iscsid.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/usr/iscsi_util.c b/usr/iscsi_util.c
index db1dc37..2f1de3e 100644
--- a/usr/iscsi_util.c
+++ b/usr/iscsi_util.c
@@ -65,36 +65,43 @@ void daemon_init(void)
close(fd);
}
-#define ISCSI_OOM_PATH_LEN 48
-
+/*
+ * make a best effort at ajusting our nice
+ * score and our OOM score, but it's not considered
+ * fatal if either adjustment fails
+ *
+ * return 0 on success of OOM adjustment
+ */
int oom_adjust(void)
{
int fd;
- char path[ISCSI_OOM_PATH_LEN];
- struct stat statb;
+ int res = 0;
errno = 0;
if (nice(-10) == -1 && errno != 0)
- log_debug(1, "Could not increase process priority: %s",
+ log_warning("Could not increase process priority: %s",
strerror(errno));
- snprintf(path, ISCSI_OOM_PATH_LEN, "/proc/%d/oom_score_adj", getpid());
- if (stat(path, &statb)) {
- /* older kernel so use old oom_adj file */
- snprintf(path, ISCSI_OOM_PATH_LEN, "/proc/%d/oom_adj",
- getpid());
- }
- fd = open(path, O_WRONLY);
- if (fd < 0)
+ /*
+ * try the modern method of adjusting our OOM score,
+ * then try the old one, if that fails
+ */
+ if ((fd = open("/proc/self/oom_score_adj", O_WRONLY)) >= 0) {
+ if ((res = write(fd, "-1000", 5)) < 0)
+ log_warning("Could not set /proc/self/oom_score_adj to -1000: %s",
+ strerror(errno));
+ } else if ((fd = open("/proc/self/oom_adj", O_WRONLY)) >= 0) {
+ if ((res = write(fd, "-17", 3)) < 0)
+ log_warning("Could not set /proc/self/oom_adj to -16: %s",
+ strerror(errno));
+ } else
return -1;
- if (write(fd, "-16", 3) < 0) /* for 2.6.11 */
- log_debug(1, "Could not set oom score to -16: %s",
- strerror(errno));
- if (write(fd, "-17", 3) < 0) /* for Andrea's patch */
- log_debug(1, "Could not set oom score to -17: %s",
- strerror(errno));
+
close(fd);
- return 0;
+ if (res < 0)
+ return res;
+ else
+ return 0;
}
char*
diff --git a/usr/iscsid.c b/usr/iscsid.c
index 04ab667..61ef08f 100644
--- a/usr/iscsid.c
+++ b/usr/iscsid.c
@@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
/* oom-killer will not kill us at the night... */
if (oom_adjust())
- log_debug(1, "can not adjust oom-killer's pardon");
+ log_warning("Cannot adjust oom-killer's pardon");
/* we don't want our active sessions to be paged out... */
if (mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE)) {
--
2.27.0
此处可能存在不合适展示的内容,页面不予展示。您可通过相关编辑功能自查并修改。
如您确认内容无涉及 不当用语 / 纯广告导流 / 暴力 / 低俗色情 / 侵权 / 盗版 / 虚假 / 无价值内容或违法国家有关法律法规的内容,可点击提交进行申诉,我们将尽快为您处理。