From bfa090ce83f2b0734c526a4426a20f6f0f943aa0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:36:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] lgtm: complain about accept() [people should use accept4()
 instead, due to O_CLOEXEC]

(cherry picked from commit e2d0fa6feb3797246c8bfda3db45a2f5b62e1b5b)

Related: #2017033
---
 .lgtm/cpp-queries/PotentiallyDangerousFunction.ql | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/.lgtm/cpp-queries/PotentiallyDangerousFunction.ql b/.lgtm/cpp-queries/PotentiallyDangerousFunction.ql
index 96712cf1c6..865330430d 100644
--- a/.lgtm/cpp-queries/PotentiallyDangerousFunction.ql
+++ b/.lgtm/cpp-queries/PotentiallyDangerousFunction.ql
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ predicate potentiallyDangerousFunction(Function f, string message) {
   ) or (
     f.getQualifiedName() = "strerror" and
     message = "Call to strerror() is not thread-safe. Use strerror_r() or printf()'s %m format string instead."
+  ) or (
+    f.getQualifiedName() = "accept" and
+    message = "Call to accept() is not O_CLOEXEC-safe. Use accept4() instead."
   )
 }