In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
IntheLinuxkernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.
| linux | | https://git.kernel.org/linus/64933ab7b04881c6c18b21ff206c12278341c72e | https://git.kernel.org/linus/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 | ubuntu |
</details>
二、漏洞分析结构反馈
影响性分析说明:
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agprefBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of thedb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check fordb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20index 7936 is out of range for type atomic_t[128] Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are validindexes for the db_agfree array.